<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/5974596?origin\x3dhttp://gamindu.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Why?

Why the dickens, not? 

Sunday, October 31, 2004

Devilus Chickus

Most of us it seems, consider our Avatars(Yahoo Avatars, that is) as a projection of ourselves. When we dress up our avatars, choose accessories, settings, etc. are we compensating for what we cannot do in real life? I am most probably wrong here; just a thought.

But who says that an Avatar need be a projection of oneself? Why cannot it be a companion? A companion on your strolls down the internet. And if I want a companion, why can't I have a companion of the opposite gender? Would that not be preferable? And if it be a companion of the opposite gender, what's so wrong with having a skimpily/provocatively clad, companion of the opposite gender?

I think I will call mine Meeka.

urped by gumz @ 1:06 PM

© gumz 2005 - Powered for Blogger by Blogger Templates

Powered by Blogger Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com